The constitutional corpus and its audit record — published in full, including the audits that failed the methodology.
The plain-talk front page is the position stated simply. These are the documents underneath it — the constitutional substrate, written to be argued with. Each was developed through cross-LLM adversarial dialogue: a writing model proposes, independent models from other lineages audit, and the disagreement that survives is the part worth keeping. Friction is not the obstacle to the work. It is the work.
Status is stated honestly per document. A document that has not yet been through its first audit cycle says so, in red. Nothing here is marked more settled than it is.
The founding set also includes Mission and Terrain. Those, and the full audit texts and integration maps across cycles 1–4, are part of the corpus and will be posted here as they clear formatting for the public surface.
Practitioners considering adoption are expected to read the audit record as part of evaluating the methodology.
Ideas, not products · Plain talk about carbon and silicon working together